Online Professional Skilled Freelancers Contact Us Get Now!
المشاركات

Iranian Strategic Culture and Nuclear Ambition

Please wait 0 seconds...
Scroll Down and click on Go to Link for destination
Congrats! Link is Generated

 (NOTE:  I wrote this essay in 2007 and was published by the South Korean news platform Ohmynews International. I updated it in 2010 or 2011 and published it on my blog. I am sharing  this article due to the prevailing conflict in ME, I think it will help students understand Iranian Strategic Culture and the mindset and values that shape the Iranian mindset)

 


In my earlier essays Israeli Strategic Culture and Iranian Nuclear Program, I discussed Israeli strategic culture and Israeli perceptions of the Iranian nuclear threat. In applying strategic culture theory, I tried to project Israeli threat perception and a possible Israeli response. In this essay, we will try to understand the factors governing the Iranian mindset, their strategic approach, and their possible response to Pressure to abandon the Nuclear Program.

As we know, strategic culture is “a collectivity of beliefs, norms, values and historical experiences of the dominant elite in a polity that influences their understanding and interpretation of security issues and environment, and shapes their responses” ( Dr. Hassan Askari Rizvi, former professor at the Punjab University, Lahore, Pakistan)

Iranian strategic culture is influenced by three factors:

1.   pride of the Iranian past

2.    Shia Islam

3.   experiences of revolution.

Then there is the culture of revolution which has its own experiences and apprehensions.

Iran is a nation-state dominated by an Aryan race group, although Azaries, Arabs, Baluchi, and others are also important ethnic groups. The state religion is Islam and a majority (89%) follows the Asna Ashari sect of Shia Islam. Others include Ismaili Shiites and Sunni (9%) as well as Baha’is, Mandeans, Hindus, Yezidis, Yarsanis, Zoroastrians, Jews, and Christians.

Iran is situated at a very strategic location. It’s on the mouth of the Strait of Hormuz through which 40 % of the world’s oil supply passes every day and also because it joins Euro-Asia, Central Asia, and South Asia with the Middle East. It has a nearly 4,000-year-long history, and due to its rich past, it has a well-developed culture and national pride. The era of Dara, Nosherwan, etc. is still a part of Iranian self-esteem.

Iranians are one of the oldest people having a glorious history. Historically, they have stood up to outside challenges. Unlike their neighbors, they have great pride for their past.

Islam came to Iran in A.D. 633-656 with the fall of the Sassanids and the decline of the Zoroastrian religion. As mentioned earlier, Iranians follow the Asna Asheri sect of Shia Islam, which is also known as the 12 Imam Shia Islam and is the second largest Muslim sect after the Sunni sect.

Shia hold fast to the teachings of the Prophet and believe that his family, including his descendants, known as Aimah e Ahle Bait, have a special spiritual and political rule over the Muslims.

According to Shia belief, the 12th Imam or Imam Mahdi will come as a savior of the Ummah and will fight the battle with the Jews and the Antichrist in which Mahdi will kill the Antichrist. Mahdi will be aided by the second coming of Christ. According to the Hadiths the Antichrist, or Dajjal, will be killed at the door of Lodd. (Presently, there is a major Israeli Air Force base situated in Lodd.)

Shia Muslims take pride in Martyrdom. According to them, their history is full of Martyrs starting from Imam Ali to Imam Hassan Askari, the 11th Imam.

The effect of this belief was seen during the Iran-Iraq War , when Iranian mothers sent their children to fight Iraq, sometime as young as 14 years old. Iranians, inferior in Weapons, fought well against much superior Iraqis who had the latest weapons given by Western powers.

The second factor that shapes the mindset of the Iranian Strategic Elite is Pride in their national history and culture. Iran remained a dominant power throughout history. Their language and culture have strong marks in all of the Middle East and South and Central Asia. In my personal experience many times I found Iranians displaying a superiority complex. They take pride in their history and culture and are bound in actions under its influence.

 During the Shah Mohammad Raza Pehalvi’s Times, Iran aspired to become a regional power. Shah of Iran dreamed Iran to be a superpower one day. Iranian intervention in Oman to curb The Dhofar Rebellion (1962-75) was an effort in pursuit of the role of leadership and regional power.

The Third Factor that shaped the Iranian psyche is the period of exploitation by the Late Shah Mohammad Raza’s Regime, which was supported by the United States and the West. His reign was regarded as the most corrupt, and nepotism among the elite was the norm in government at the time. Vast oil and natural resource deposits, as well as their income, were utilized to fund the lavish lifestyles of the rich, while the poor suffered greatly under the US-backed regime.

 In 1951 Muhammad Mossadaq, an Iranian Nationalist by conviction was chosen as Prime Minister by Majlis. He gained mass popularity and support which infuriated Shah’s regime.

Mossadaq Nationalized the oil industry which was largely controlled by British oil companies. This infuriated the US and the British. At one time Mossadaq reached a point of popularity where Shah became insecure and had to escape from Iran. To save their oil interests American CIA and British MI6 Staged a coup and in the end, Shah was reinstalled and the most popular leader of the masses was ousted.

The ousting of Mossadaq was a short-term relief for the American and British-backed Shah. The public demand for change was forced underground but finally, society erupted and under the guidance and leadership of Rohullah Khomeini Iran witnessed a revolution in 1979, ending Anglo-American-supported Shah Mohammed Raza Pehalvi’s regime.

Shah wanted to change Iran. He was over-ambitious and there were growing economic gaps in society. Although Shah tried to bring reforms and modernize the society, his policies and reforms were not accepted by traditional Iranian masses who were hard-pressed due to the growing gap between rich and poor.

Mohammad Raza Pehalvi wanted to change the society. He wanted to return of the era of Iranian glory.  This he expressed in October 1971 at the 2500th anniversary of the Iranian Monarchy. For the ceremony, nearly all the heads of state were invited and a tent city was created next to the ruins of Persepolis. According to reports this anniversary cost 100 million Dollars, In a country where the poor were getting poorer and the rich were getting richer, it was enough to add insult to injury for the poor.

Another thing that was unwise but was done by Shah was an effort to change the social setup of a deeply religious and conservative society. His liberal ideas were not digestible for common Iranians. His regime was trying to cross the limits of culture and religion. To implement his agenda he used torture and all the ruthless tricks to suppress any dissent.

This made religious clerics against the Shah. His concessions to the US and UK and the gap between rich and poor forced the left to oppose the shah and, in the end, forced forces of Left (Mujahideen Khalaq) and Right (Mullahs) joined hands to work together against the Shah Regime. In 1979 Iran underwent a revolution. It was against Shah but US and West took it as anti-Western revolution.

The revolution brought some changes as the new elite has its Values to follow.

From the start west, especially the US took a hostile stance against Iran and the revolution. The US and its allies instigated Iraq to wage war against Iran and then Provided Iraq with the latest weapons. They urged Arabs to support Iraq and presented the war as sectarian and Persian v. Arabs.

After Iran Iran-Iraq war, the US, and the West tried to pressure and topple the Iranian government by putting sanctions on the pretext of different issues and then supporting dissent in Iran against the Clerical Regime.

According to Seymour Hirsh’s article, Redirection, Published in New Yorker magazine in 2007. US and its allies are supporting anti-government forces in Iranian Azerbaijan, Khuzestan and Kurdistan, etc.

Interestingly after the Iraq invasion in 2003, the US which had designated Mujahideen Khalaq (MeK) as a Terrorist Organization and, which had bases in Iraq was not touched. Similarly, Kurdish rebels were allowed to be trained By Israeli commandos to be used in future conflicts with Iran.

The hostile stance of the West has had enormous effects on Iranian strategic thinking and culture. Iran’s economy due to sanctions is in bad shape. Iran which is a major oil producer can’t purify its oil and have to get it refined from outside.  US and West support to dissent has made the Iranian regime more stubborn and motivated to safeguard the Iranian Revolution.

Militarily the Iranians, due to continuous sanctions, have developed special tactics and weapons to counter threats. They have also maintained links with popular nonstatuesque forces in the region like Hamas in Palestine and Hezbollah in Lebanon, Houthis of Yemen, and like-minded groups in Iraq and Syria.

Iran started its nuclear program to fulfill its energy needs but the West accused it that it was making an Atomic bomb. Rohullah Khomeini, the spiritual and ideologue of the 1979 Iranian Islamic revolution, in one fatwa, declared WMD’s haram, Although Iraqis under Saddam Hussain used Poisonous gasses against Iranians, Iran never went after chemical weapons. Today Iranian government maintains that nuclear weapons are haram and it is nuclear program is not for weaponization.

Today US and Israel are seen as happy due to  Syrian Protests and unrest against Bashar ul Asads regime. In Israeli and American calculus Regime change in Syria is necessary to cut down the line of supply to Hezbollah and Hamas and to limit their freedom and capability to strike back in case Iran is attacked.

If Israel attacks Iran there will be repercussions throughout the Middle East. Iranian first action would be to block the strait of Hurmuz by sinking some ships and making it unusable for sea traffic. Attack on Iran will also unite Iran and Persian pride will force nations to unite against outside threats.

Summing up Iranian Nuclear Program is criticized unjustly. Iran has the right to use nuclear energy for its energy requirements. Iranian strategic culture dictates Iran will never give up on outside pressure and the path it feels is right.

 

Bibliography

1.   Behind Iranian Lines by John Simson

2.   Delta Force by Col Charli Beckwith

3.   Return of Ayatullah by Mohammad Hussain Haykal

4.   Articles of Robert Fisk

5.   The Redirection (2007) by Seymor Hersh, New Yorker

 

 

 

About the Author

Strategic Analysis Group is an online forum of Pakistani journalists, who are contributing to provide a better understanding of strategic and international developments. It is done with objectivity without sensationalism that is prevalent in our so…

إرسال تعليق

Cookie Consent
We serve cookies on this site to analyze traffic, remember your preferences, and optimize your experience.
Oops!
It seems there is something wrong with your internet connection. Please connect to the internet and start browsing again.
AdBlock Detected!
We have detected that you are using adblocking plugin in your browser.
The revenue we earn by the advertisements is used to manage this website, we request you to whitelist our website in your adblocking plugin.
Site is Blocked
Sorry! This site is not available in your country.